I would do it on a piece of Jewlery she wouldn't ever be allowed to take of like her earrings I would microchip all of her sets so incase God forbid she gets kidnapped I could find her thanks to her earrings

No, I think that would lead to more bad than good. I also take the Christian stance.

Nope. Every one has the right to total privacy. I wouldn't want one in me so I wouldn't do the same to my kids.

I probably would. I wouldn't abuse it though. As in I would only look at if it was absolutely necessary. Not sure how I feel about this though.

Yes

Hell no.

Hell no

Hmm.. I have such mixed feelings on this. Yes because I'm terrified of a criminal minds type of situation happening to my child. . But at the same time it just feels wrong.

I'll be thinking about this one for a while...

Hell yes, way too many sickos out there, plus it would be a huge relief knowing where they are if they're late and not answering their phones.

I'd possibly out it in jewellery or something so I know where they are should something bad happen. I would hate the thought of them going missing and never knowing what happened .

Yes.. I would ..I lost my daughter, I couldn't bear the pain of losing another child!!

You can already get bracelets that have a chip in them for kids. I think it is a way of using all of our technology to our advantage.

I'm torn. Yes! Because obviously f my child is abducted, I'd be able to hunt that mother f*** er down with a quickness. But no, because what if it's government run, and common knowledge, or a hack able system and there goes my safety measure.

What is the mark of the beast:

The main passage in the Bible that mentions the "mark of the beast" is Revelation 13:15-18. Other references can be found in Revelation 14:9, 11, 15:2, 16:2, 19:20, and 20:4. This mark acts as a seal for the followers of Antichrist and the false prophet (the spokesperson for the Antichrist). The false prophet (the second beast) is the one who causes people to take this mark. The mark is literally placed in the hand or forehead and is not simply a card someone carries.

The recent breakthroughs in medical implant chip and RFID technologies have increased interest in the mark of the beast spoken of in Revelation chapter 13. It is possible that the technology we are seeing today represents the beginning stages of what may eventually be used as the mark of the beast. It is important to realize that a medical implant chip is not the mark of the beast. The mark of the beast will be something given only to those who worship the Antichrist. Having a medical or financial microchip inserted into your right hand or forehead is not the mark of the beast. The mark of the beast will be an end-times identification required by the Antichrist in order to buy or sell, and it will be given only to those who worship the Antichrist.

Many good expositors of Revelation differ widely as to the exact nature of the mark of the beast. Besides the implanted chip view, other speculations include an ID card, a microchip, a barcode that is tattooed into the skin, or simply a mark that identifies someone as being faithful to the Antichrist's kingdom. This last view requires the least speculation, since it does not add any more information to what the Bible gives us. In other words, any of these things are possible, but at the same time they are all speculations. We should not spend a lot of time speculating on the precise details.

The meaning of 666 is a mystery as well. Some have speculated that there was a connection to June 6, 2006"06/06/06. However, in Revelation chapter 13, the number 666 identifies a person, not a date. Revelation 13:18 tells us, "This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666." Somehow, the number 666 will identify the Antichrist. For centuries Bible interpreters have been trying to identify certain individuals with 666. Nothing is conclusive. That is why Revelation 13:18 says the number requires wisdom. When the Antichrist is revealed (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4), it will be clear who he is and how the number 666 identifies him.

Mark of the beast? What is that? Sounds terrifying and its almost a 12am and don't want to have a nightmare of the devil

No I wouldn't. At some point that system could get hacked and well we would all be in danger.

Nope... And no the mark doesn't have to be a tattoo... I'm not letting anything like that in my body....one day they will try and force it on us

Commenting so I can read this when it's not pitch black out. Yes! I'm a pansy.

I made a post like this when I first got bb a few years ag o and got torn to shreds.

I must have deleted it.lol no I most certainly would not.

I wouldn't get anything injected into their body though. (Plus I'm super paro about 'the mark of the beast' conspiracy)

However, if I could microchip it to their hair or something, I wouldn't say no too fast

Isn't the mark of the beast, the "666" tattooed to your forehead? Correct me if I'm wrong...

Hell no wtf

I googled "mark of the beast" and oh my!

Yes.. For the kind of world their growing up in.. I would rather find them if something were to happen than never seeing them again.

No. I'm christian and we believe its the mark of the beast.

No. If it were a common thing, a predator could attempt to remove the chip from a child's body.

Yes. Yes I would.

Both my 13yr olds have the I phone 6 so I can track them on that and they never put it down, its attached to them.

Liam Neeson would, I bet.

I think I would... Not sure...

I have my dogs chipped, and I'm not doing anything that I need to worry about the government finding me or my family. Should the government lose its mind and become an actual danger, it's not like they're hard to remove. I'd consider it for my kids and myself.

No way! Not only will you be able to track your kids but the government also NO THANKS! I see it leading to a lot more then just tracking

Nope.

No, I wouldn't put something like that in my child. Someone somewhere could probably hack into your tracker system and now your child is an open target.

Or to sound like one of those people with a tin foil hat on, if it was government run when our children are older they'd just be easy sheep with a tag.

Yes I would. As long as there was an option where they could have it removed at 18 or something.

Probably.

No ?

Yes only because iv almost been kidnapped before.

If it's in a area where it can't be dug out by a kidnapper or put in a place they'll know where it's at, hell yes. I can't imagine the torture these patents go through never knowing what happened to their kids.

Yes I'd do it, I'm overprotective when it comes to my girls.

No.

No

Nope.