And actually if you read the actual studies, the proof of it being more sanitary is that an intact boy has a .01 percent higher chance of getting an infection due to his foreskin. A boy is more likely to hemorrhage or have an incorrect circumcision that needs to be corrected than any intact boy's chances of getting an infection due to his foreskin.

There's no point to circumcision. It's really traumatic and hurts the baby too. My son isn't circumcised and it's been the best decision. I couldn't imagine handing him over to anyone to have them cut off a perfectly healthy and sensitive piece of skin off of him for no reason.

There is proof of it being more sanitary circumcised BUT I had my husband decide because he has one and knows it better then I do. We will circumcise Lincoln too

It's really a preference, no health benefits at all to do it or not to do it. It's really your decision on getting it done

Both my son's got it done. No problems at all.

well in my opinion I like it a lot. it's much cleaner for them.